Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ºÀÎ ¥±±Þ ȯÀÚÀÇ ¾È¸é ¼öÁ÷°í°æ ¹× ±³ÇÕÆò¸éÀÇ Æ¯Â¡¿¡ °üÇÑ µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

ROENTGENOCEPHALOMETRIC STUDY ON FACIAL HEIGHT AND OCCLUSAL PLANE INCLINATION IN CLASS IL MALOCLUSION GROU

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 1998³â 28±Ç 2È£ p.255 ~ 268
³²µ¿¼®, Á¤¹ÌÇâ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³²µ¿¼® (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
Á¤¹ÌÇâ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract


This study was investigated to assess the difference of facial height and occlusal plane inclination between normal occlusion group and class 11 malocclusion group.
The subjects consisted of 50 normal occlusion (male 25, female 25) and 50 class II(male 25, female 25) malocclusion patients. All subjects are adult. lateral cephalogram was taken with standard method, traced, and digitized for each subjects. The computerized statiscal analysis was carried out with SPSS program.

The results were as follows

1. In class II malocclusion group, variables significant different from normal occlusion group were as follows SN-FOP, FH-BOP, MP-BOP, AB-BOP, AB-FOP, Facial plane-BOP, FP-FOP.
2. In class II malocclusion group, the posterior facial height -especially posterior lower facial height-was significantly smaller than normal occlusion group.( P < 0.05)
3. In class II malocclusion group, the angles bEStween occlusal plane and upper and lower incisor, the angle between upper molar and bisected occlusal plane we e significantly larger than those of normal occlusion group. (P < 0.05)
4. LI to Mandibular plane (mm) was a unique factor of occlusal plane position that showed significant difference in class -Il1 malocclusion group.
5. The correlation between overbite and occlusal plane inclination existed in class II malocclusion group, but the correlation didn¢¥t exist in normal occlusion group.

Å°¿öµå

±³ÇÕÆò¸é;¥±±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ;¾È¸é°í°æ;occlusal plane;class ¥± malocclusion;facial height

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed